EVALUATION OF GREEN PRODUCTS IN THE LITERATURE: TRENDS RESEARCH FROM 2000 TO 2022
Abstract
The phrase "green products" is used to describe goods that are manufactured, used, and discarded in a way that reduces their impact on the environment in terms of pollution, hazardous materials, and other chemical waste. Therefore, there is hope that green goods may benefit both the planet and human health. Businesses with a commitment to sustainability have shifted their focus to creating green products in response to rising demand for such goods and a slew of new laws protecting the environment. The present investigation used bibliometric methods along with other indicators to ascertain the growth of green product research from 2000 to 2022. As a means of mapping out the region's dominant tendencies, VOS viewer software was used. Six hundred and fifty-nine publications related to eco-friendly goods were culled from the SCOPUS database within the study's time frame. According to the statistics, the market for environmentally friendly goods has exploded since 2000 , especially during the last 14 years. In terms of both output and citations, the United States of America is head and shoulders above the competition. Several "green" subthemes seem to be emerging, all of which are connected to environmental and health awareness, customer trust, and brand loyalty.
Keyword : Bibliometric, Green, Products, Analysis, sustainable products.
![Creative Commons License](../../lib/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adams, R.., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Denyer, D., & Overy, P(2016). Sustainability-oriented innovation: A systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews., 18, 180–205 Albort-Morant, G., Henseler, J., Leal-Millán, A., & Cepeda-Carrión, G.(2017) Mapping the field: A bibliometric analysis of green innovation. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1011 Amirbagheri, K., Nunez-Carballosa, A., Guitart-Tarrés, L., & Merigó, J.M.(2019) Research on green supply chain:A bibliometric analysis. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2019, 21, 3–22. Axelrod, L.J., & Lehman, D.R.,.(1993) Responding to environmental concerns: What factors guide individual action? Journal of Environmental Psychology., 13, 149–159. Basiri,Z., & Heydari.,j(2017) A mathematical model for green supply chain coordination With substitutable products .journal of cleaner production (2017) ; 145,pp.232-249 Bhatt, Y., Ghuman, K., & Dhir, A.(2020) Sustainable manufacturing. Bibliometrics and content analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020, 260, 120988 Chen ,Y.S., Chiu, S.C.,, Lin ,S., Wu ,K.H., Corporate social responsibility and income smoothing: Supply chain perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 97 (2019), pp. 76-9 Chekima, B., Khalid wafa,S.A.,Lgau,O.A.,& Sondoh Jr,S.L., (2016) Examining green consumerism motivational drivers:Does .premium prices and demographics matter to green purchasing. Journal of cleaner productin 112,pp.3436-3450 Coba, M.F., Valencia, G.E., & Acevedo, C.H.(2018) Sustainability under research in green energy: A bibliometric study. International Journal Chemtech Research 2018, 11, 210–215. Dangelico, R.M.,(2016) Green product innovation: Where we are and where we are going. Business Strategy and the Environment 25, 560–576. De Medeiros, J.F., Ribeiro, J.L.D.,& Cortimiglia, M.N.,(2014) Success factors for environmentally sustainable product innovation: A systematic literature review .Journal of cleaner production; 65, 76–86. EI-Kassar,A-N., & Singh,S.K(2019) Green innovation and organizational performance The influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices. Technological forcasting and social change 144,pp 483-498 Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J. & Davarzani, H.(2015) Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production and Economics. 2015, 162, 101–114 Gaffney ,O. (2014) Sustainable development goals: improving human and planetary wellbeing. Global Change 1(82):20–23 Gupta,S. & Ogden,D.T.(2009). To buy or not to buy ?A social perspective on green buying. journal of consumer marketing 26(6)pp 378-393 Gurau,c. & Ranchhod,A.(2005)International green marketing: a comparative study of British and Romanian firms. International Marketing Review, Vol. 22 No.5,pp.547-561 Hilger , J., Hallstein ,E., Stevens,A.W.,& Villas-Boas,S.B.(2019) Measuring willingness to pay for environmental attributes in seafood Environmental and Resource Economics, 73 (1) (2019), pp. 307-33 Hussain,M.A., 2014 M.A., Khokhar M.F., Asad,A.,(2014) Green awareness effects on consumers purchasing decision: A case of Pakistan Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 14 (6) (2014), pp. 9-15 Igau,O.,A.,Chekima,S.,Sondoh,S.L.,(2016) premium prices and demographics matter to green purchasing Journal of cleaner productin (2016)112,pp.3436-3450 Latha,ds.(2017) A study on factors influencing on consumer behaviour towards cosmetics with special reference to Chennai city, International Journal of Applied Research 2017; 3(6): 1038-1042 Leonidou,C.N.,Kasikeas,C.S., & Morgan,N.A. (2013) “Greening” the marketing mix:Do firms do it and does it pay off. Journal of the Academy of marketing science 2013; 41(2), pp.151-170 Maichum,k.,parichatnon & peng,k-c(2016)application of the extended theory of planned behaviour Model to investigate purchase intention of green consumer Of the thai consumer,sustainability8(10),1077 Mammadli, M., Sadik-Zada, E.R., Gatto, A., & Huseynova, R.(2021) What Drives Public Debt Growth? A Focus on Natural Resources, Sustainability and Development. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 2021, 11, 614–621 Nielsen (2018), “Growth at the intersection of healthy for me and healthy for we”, available at: www.nielsen.com/us/en/ insights/report/2018/unpacking-the-sustainability-landscape/ (accessed 12December 2019). Ramayah, T., Lee, JWC.,& Mohamad, O. (2010) Green product purchase intention: some insights from a developing country. Resources Conservation Recycling 54(12):1419–1427. Rex,e.,& Bauman,H.(2007) Beyond ecolablels ;What can learn from conventional marketing Journal of clearner production 15(6) pp 567-576 Sangwan, K.S., & Mittal, V.K.(2015) A bibliometric analysis of green manufacturing and similar frameworks. Management of Environmental Quality. 2015, 26, 566–587 Scopus. Available online: https://www.elsevier.com/en-in/solutions/scopus Sdrolia, E.,& Zarotiadis, G. A.(2018) comprehensive review for green product term: From definition to evaluation. Journal of Economic Surveys. 2018, 33, 150–178. Sharma, B.R..,& Sharma, D(2008). Impact of Climate Change on Water Resources and Glacier Melt and Potential Adaptations for Indian Agriculture. In Proceedings of the 33rd Indian Agricultural Universities Association Vice Chancellors Annual Convention on “Climate Change and its Effect on Agriculture”, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, India, 4–5 December 2008. Shittu, O. (2020) Emerging sustainability concerns and policy implications of urban household consumption: a systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Producation 246:119034 Tang,L.,& Gekara.,V.(2020), The importance of customer expectations – An analysis of CSR in container shipping Journal of Business Ethics, 165 (2020), pp. 383-393 Tang,M.,Walsh,G.,Learner,D.,Fitza, M.A.,& Li,Q.(2018) Green innovation ,managerial concern and Firm performance: An Empirical study ,business strategy And the Environment27(1),pp.39-51 Teng, PK., Ow, MW., Sandhu, SK.,& Kassim, UK. (2018) Green attitude and purchase intention towards environmental friendly product. Journal of Emerging Economies and Islamic Research 6(1):17–25 Walsh,G., Mitchell,V.W., Jackson,P.R., & Beatty,S.E.,(2009) Examining the antecedents and consequences of corporate reputation: A customer perspective. British Journal of Management, 20 (2) (2009), pp. 187-20 Xiao, Y.,& Watson, M.(2019) Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2019, 39, 93–112 Zhao, X., Zuo, J., Wu, G., & Huang, C.(2019) A bibliometric review of green building research 2000–2016 Architectural Science Review 2019, 62, 74–88