Share:


MAXIMISERS OR SATISFICERS? IRONY OF CHOICE AND DECISION PARALYSIS SYNDROME AMONG ADOLESCENTS IN KERALA

    Tushar Soubhari, Dr. Satheesh E.K. , Lineesh P, Dr. Niyaz Panakaje, Dr Jency Treesa, Manu Antony

Abstract

Purpose- Adolescence is the life phase between childhood and adulthood (aging from 10 to 19, as defined by the World Health Organisation). It is a stage of Identity Crisis; pushed back by undefined status, increased pressures, irrational decisions, and the search for self. ‘Making a choice’ is what exhibits one’s freedom and autonomy. It is axiomatic that a choice is good, but too many choices may confuse at times. Such a paralytic situation drowns the adolescents’ thoughts to indecisiveness and experience a misery-induced-tyranny. Hence, this paper discusses on how adolescents take decisions out of informed choices from various life aspects; reasons for their decision paralysis and defence mechanisms they adopt to rationalise their decisions. The study highlights decision-making styles among adolescents as ‘Maximisers’ and ‘Satisficers’ (Simon, 1956). Maximisers tend to be perfectionists, describing moreover an uncompromised and distressed approach to life. Satisficers opt for best possible choice, imparting happiness within themselves with what they opt. Design/ Methodology-Primary data was collected based on the standardised ‘Maximisation Scale’, with thirteen items propounded by Barry Schwartz in 2002 along with borrowed concepts from the ‘Desirability of Control Scale’ derived from the studies of Burger, J. M., & Cooper, H. M. (1979). The new scale was developed and validated based on thirty-nine statements under three factors, namely High Standards, Alternative Search and Decision Difficulty measured on the five-point rating Likert scale. The sample size estimated for the study was 232 respondents amongst adolescents from the state of Kerala, India. Lottery method of sampling was adopted to collect samples from the total universe of adolescents in Kerala. Data was grouped classifying them based on gender- Male, Female and Transgenders. Findings- As per most of the adolescence respondents tends to be ‘maximisers’ as the decision scores in these cases ranged from 71 to 117. Based on the objectives we found that adolescents take decisions out of informed choices from various life aspects. The analysis of data has been hypothesised and proved that their decision style is influenced by their demographical characteristics. It was also discovered that there is direct correlation between high design factors, alternative searches, and decision difficulty factors of adolescents. Practical Implications: This paper provides practical insights on how adolescents take up decisions as ‘maximisers’ or ‘satisficers’ and how this stand leads them facing decision paralysis due to overchoice problem. Originality/ Value- The paper is the first of its kind not ever published elsewhere and is original in nature.

Keyword : Adolescence, Maximisers, Satisficers, Choice, Decision Paralysis

Published in Issue
Oct 14, 2022
Abstract Views
11
PDF Downloads
07
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References


References 1. Botti, S., & Iyengar, S. S. (2006). The Dark Side of Choice: When Choice Impairs Social Welfare. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.25.1.24 2. Chernev, A., Böckenholt, U., & Goodman, J. (2015). Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 333-358. DOI:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002 3. Gardner, M., and Steinberg, L. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: an experimental study. Dev. Psychol. 41, 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.625 4. Iyengar, S. S. & DeVoe, S. E. (2004). Managers' theories of subordinates: A cross-cultural examination of manager perceptions of motivation and appraisal of performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.09.001 5. Iyengar, S. S., Wells, R. E., & Schwartz, B. (2006). Doing better but feeling worse. Looking for the “best” job undermines satisfaction. Psychological Science, 17, 143–150. 6. Iyengar, S., & Lepper, M. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995-1006. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995 7. Mann, L., Harmoni, R., & Power, C. (1989). Adolescent decision-making: The development of competence. Journal of Adolescence, 12(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-1971(89)90077-8 8. Messer, S. B. (1976). Reflection-impulsivity: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 83(6), 1026–1052. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.83.6.1026. 9. Miller, D. C., & Byrnes, J. P. (2001). To achieve or not to achieve: A self-regulation perspective on adolescents' academic decision making. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(4), 677–685. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.677 10. Nenkov, G. Y., Morrin, M., Ward, A., Schwartz, B., & Hulland, J. (2008). A short form of the Maximization Scale: Factor structure, reliability and validity studies. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/t03407-000 11. Schwartz, B. (2000). Self determination: The tyranny of freedom. American Psychologist, 55, 79-88. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.79 12. Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York: Ecco 13. Schwartz, B. (2005). The paradox of choice [Video]. TED: Ideas worth spreading. Barry Schwartz: The paradox of choice | TED Talk 14. Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., and Lehman, D. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: happiness is a matter of choice. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83, 1178–1197. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1178 15. Schwartz, Barry (2004). The Paradox Of Choice. New York, United States: Harper Perennial. ISBN 0-06-000568-8. 16. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioural model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118. https://doi.org/10,2307/1884852 17. Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structures of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042769 18. Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man; social and rational. Wiley. 19. Tuinstra, J., van Sonderen, FLP., Groothoff, JW., van den Heuvel, WJA., & Post, D. (2000). Reliability, validity and structure of the Adolescent Decision Making Questionnaire among adolescents in The Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(2), 273-285. http://share.eldoc.ub.rug.nl/FILES/root2/2000/Relivaans/Tuinstra_2000_Personality_and_Individual.pdf 20. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Jelsma, O. (1988). The Matching Familiar Figures Test: Computer or experimenter controlled administration? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 161–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448804800119. Websites: https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/bounded-rationality https://www.lukew.com/ff/entry.asp?429 https://neurofied.com/paradox-of-choice-why-less-more/ https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/is-the-famous-paradox-of-choic https://www.britannica.com/science/adolescence https://www.aacap.org/AACAP/Families_and_Youth/Facts_for_Families/FFF-Guide/The-Teen-Brain-Behavior-Problem-Solving-and-Decision-Making-095.aspx https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/satisficing.asp https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kochi/one-out-of-five-teens-in-kerala-suffer-from-psychological-distress-study/articleshow/66146766.cms https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-an-identity-crisis-2795948 http://psychology.iresearchnet.com/social-psychology/self/identity-crisis/ http://ww3.haverford.edu/psychology/ddavis/p109g/erikson.identity.html https://hbr.org/2006/06/more-isnt-always-better https://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/2014/07/29/fomo-history/ https://hbr.org/podcast/2019/12/season-3-finale-how-fomo-was-created https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01915/full Videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkayGd63RzI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhtmhaboE94&t=1041s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhtmhaboE94&t=1386s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhtmhaboE94&t=1543s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhtmhaboE94&t=207s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhtmhaboE94&t=2646s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhtmhaboE94&t=2790s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhtmhaboE94&t=2803s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhtmhaboE94&t=285s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhtmhaboE94&t=3289s