EFFECTS OF THE PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROCESS AT EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
Abstract
An institution must have an assessment procedure in place to be successful. Each institution has a unique system in place for assessment. At light of the evolving educational landscape, the performance appraisal (PA) system in universities and higher education institutions has acquired significant importance. The performance evaluation process is less strict in higher education institutions than it is in commercial enterprises. Companies now use well-organized systems for evaluating employee performance, such as the Management by Objective and Multiple Source (360 degree) Appraisal Method). Because of globalisation, the globe has been expanding quickly, and the composite market has become smaller. As a consequence, educational institutions are unable to avoid competition and are forced to take the initiative in a conflict with educational facilitators. The management of faculty performance and effectiveness today requires an organised framework of evaluation, therefore the faculty appraisal system in Indian universities needed to be made more equitable and ready to face future problems. The purpose of this study is to determine what needs to be improved in academic institutions' performance assessment systems as well as what elements have the most impact.
Keyword : Human resource management, Management, Personnel management, Organization and Universities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
1. Agarwal, P. (2016). Higher Education in India: the need for change. Indian council for research on international economic relations, working paper no. 180, 1-181. 2. Agrawal, S. P., & Aggarwal, J. C.( 1997). Language Arts and Disciplines, Development of Education in India: A Survey of Educational Documents before and after Independence, II. 3. Alam, N., & Leturer, K.P.( 2018). Evaluation of Performance Appraisal System at GSK, Bangladesh, LTD. Retrieved from, http://www.academia.edu/6837786/Internship_Report_On_Evaluation_of_Performance_Appraisal_System_at_GSK_Bangladesh_LTD. 4. Andersen, S., & Kerstin. (2005). "National, International and transnational constructions of New Public management." In New Public Management : The Transformation of ideas and practice, ed. T. a. L. Christensen, Per. Hampshire, Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Limited. 5. Anjum . A ., & Khan B. (2011). Performance Appraisal Systems in Public Sector Universities Of Pakistan. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 1(1), 41-51. 6. Armstrong, M., & Baron, A.(2015). Managing Performance: Performance Management in Action. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, London. 7. Arreola, R. A.( 1999). Issues in developing a faculty evaluation system, 53(1), 56-63. 8. Asha. C. B. (1980). Creativity and academic achievement among secondary school children. Asian Journal of Psychology and Education, 6, 1-4. 9. Attar, G.A,. & Sweis, R. J. (2019). The Relationship Between Information Technology Adoption And Job Satisfaction In Contracting Companies In Jordan. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 15, 44-63. 10. Aydin, S. (2019). Factors Causing Demotivation in EFL Teaching Process: A Case Study, The Qualitative Report, 17(101), 1-13. 11. Aziz. A., Dixon. A.E., & Ragheb. M.A. (2005). The contemporary performance measurement techniques in Egypt: a contingency approach, Paper presented during the EDHEC conference, Nice. 12. Brayfield, H. A., & Crockett, H. (1955). Walter, Employee attitudes and employee performance. Psychological Bulletin, 52(5), .396-424. 13. Broni, A. A. (2012). Relationship between Motivation and Job Performance at the University of Mines and Technology. Tarkwa, Ghana: Leadership Lessons, Scientific Research, 3(3),309-314. 14. Burke, J.C. & Serban, A.M.( 1998). Performance Funding for Public Higher Education: Fad or Trend?: New Directions for Institutional Research, 97, 1417-2110. 15. Colbeck (2002). Integration: Evaluating faculty work as a whole. Issue 114, 43-52. Cole. G.D.H. (1925). Robert Owen. London. Benn. 16. Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. L. (2020). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development and Educational Testing Service. Daoanis Employee Performance. International Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(3), 55-62. 17. DeNisi. A.S., & Pritchard R.D.(2016). Performance appraisal, performance management and improving individual performance: A motivational framework. Management and organization Review, .2(2), 25-277. 18. Doyle, K.. (1995). Integrating performance measurement and resource planning in the University planning process. Journal of Institutional Research in Australasia, 4(1), 1-6. 19. Edwards, M., & Ewen E.( 1996). Automating 360 degree feedback. HR Focus 70:3. 20. Ellet, C. D., & Teddlie C. (2003). Teacher evaluation, teacher effectiveness, and school effectiveness: Perspectives from the USA. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17(1), 101-128. 21. Fisher, C. D., Schoenfeldt L. F., & Shaw J. B (2003). Human Resource Management,(5th ed). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company. 22. Fisher, J. G. (2005). How to run successful incentive schemes (3rd ed.).London: 23. Kojan. Fletcher, C. (2017). Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 473- 488. 24. Geofrey, Y. (2010). Motivation and Academic Staff Performance in Public Universities in Uganda: The Case of Makerere University. Retrieved from http://dspace.mak.ac.ug/handle/123456789/1339. 25. Gibson, J.L., Ivancevich, J.M., and James H. Donnely Jr. (199). Organizational Behavior Structure, Process.( 9th Edition). Irwin, Chicago. 26. Good, T. L., & Mulryan, C. (1990). Teacher Ratings: A call for teacher control and self evaluation. In J. Millman and L. Darling-Hammond (eds) The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers, Newbury Park, CA. Sage., pp.191-215. 27. Gough, D. (1991). Thinking about Thinking. Alexandria, Virginia. National Association of Elementary School Principals. 28. Khanam. A., & Mazhar. S. (2019). Efficacy Of Faculty Performance Appraisal System In Higher Educational Organization. Ijmss, 3(1). 29. Kumar, P. S., & Brahadeeswaran, D. (2011). Performance appraisal of faculty of higher educational institutions in India. AMET Journal of Management, 27-31. 30. Kumari,G. Kaleramna, N., & Pandey. K.M. (2018). Study on Performance Management System of Private Companies: a Case Study of Endurance Pvt. Ltd. Maharashtra, India. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 1( 5), 521-526.