INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES TOWARDS INDIGENOUS TOYS PRODUCERS
Abstract
The mechanical transformation, traversing from the late 18th to early 19th centuries, in a general sense, changed fabricating forms, bringing both challenges and openings for inborn toy makers. This investigation investigates the multifaceted impacts of industrialization on conventional toy-making hones. Key challenges recognized incorporate showcase competition from mass-produced toys, shifts in business designs, and the disintegration of social legacy. Mechanical headways, such as mechanization and unused materials, presented efficiencies but moreover disturbed conventional strategies. Then again, critical openings have risen for inborn toy makers. Leveraging social legacy, emphasizing feasible hones, and focusing on specialty markets offer pathways for separation and development. Case ponders from the Indian and African toy businesses outline these flows, highlighting fruitful techniques for revitalizing innate craftsmanship. This inquiry underscores the significance of protecting socially differing qualities and conventional abilities when confronted with mechanical progressions. By adjusting development with social conservation, inborn toy makers can explore the advancing market landscape and flourish within the cutting-edge economy. The current research paper contributes to a more profound understanding of the industrialization impacts and gives a guide for supporting innate toy-making conventions during worldwide financial shifts.
Keyword : Historical data, Challenges and Opportunities, Financial Impact, Social Relevance and Practical Implications.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
1. Fulop, N. (2024). Sustainable and natural techniques in model making and other industries (Doctoral dissertation, Institute of Art, Design+ Technology). 2. Wuest, T., Romero, D., Khan, M. A., & Mittal, S. (2022). The triple bottom line of smart manufacturing technologies: An economic, environmental, and social perspective. In The Routledge Handbook of Smart Technologies (pp. 312-332). Routledge. 3. Mohajan, Haradhan (2021): Third Industrial Revolution Brings Global Development. Published in: Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol. 7, No. 4 (6 December 2021): pp. 239-251. 4. Eglash, R., Robert, L., Bennett, A., Robinson, K. P., Lachney, M., & Babbitt, W. (2020). Automation for the artisanal economy: enhancing the economic and environmental sustainability of crafting professions with human–machine collaboration. Ai & Society, 35(3), 595-609. 5. Williams, S. (2020). Sustainable practices in indigenous toy production. Eco-friendly Manufacturing Journal, 12(5), 89-97. 6. Siddiqui, S., & Farooque, D. A. (2019). Study of Indo-China Trade with special reference to (Chinese Toys in Indian Market). International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 6(1), 51-58. 7. Smith, A. (2019). Mechanization and mass production in the toy industry. Industrial History Review, 28(1), 57-70. 8. Gupta, R. (2018). The Indian toy industry: Challenges and opportunities. Economic and Political Weekly, 53(3), 45-52. 9. Kiggundu, M. (2016). Reviving African craftsmanship: The role of indigenous toy producers. African Arts and Crafts Journal, 34(4), 22-30. 10. Brown, J. (2015). The impact of industrialization on traditional toy-making industries. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 20(2), 101-115.