PRINCIPLE OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND RIGHT TO RESERVATION FOR TRANSGENDER PEOPLE IN INDIA
Abstract
The issue of social justice and reservation policies has been a matter of extensive discourse in India pertaining to marginalised and disadvantaged communities. Among these communities, transgender individuals have historically endured discrimination, exclusion, and economic hardships. This research paper delves into the concept of social justice and its application to the rights of transgender people in India, with a specific focus on their right to reservation in educational institutions and public employment. Through a multidisciplinary approach, this study examines the historical background, legal framework, and societal implications of this issue. By exploring the constitutional and ethical dimensions of social justice, this paper aims to provide insight into the struggle for transgender inclusion and the potential impact of reservation policies on their socio-economic advancement. The research concludes by addressing the challenges and potential solutions for a more inclusive and equitable India.
Keyword : Transgender, Social Justice, Reservation, Constitution
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
1. Bacchetta P., 1999. When the (Hindu) nation exiles its queers. Social Text, 61, pp. 141–166. 2. Bhattacharya S., 2014. A love that dare not speak its name: exploring the marginalized status of lesbians, bisexual, and trans-men in India. Asian Journal of Women's Studies, 20(3), pp. 105–120 3. Boyce B., 2015. Sexuality and gender identity under the Constitution of India. The Journal of Gender, Race, and Justice, 18(1), pp. 1–64. 4. Chakrapani V., 2010. Hijras/Transgender in India: HIV, Human Rights, and Social Exclusion 5. Doniger W., 1999. Splitting the Difference: Gender and Myth in Ancient Greece and India. Chicago: Chicago University Press. 6. Dutta A., 2012a. Between aid conditionality and identity politics–the MSM-transgender divide and normative cartographies of gender vs. sexuality. 7. Dutta A., 2014. Contradictory tendencies: the Supreme Court's NALSA judgment on transgender recognition and rights. Journal of Indian Law and Society, 5(Monsoon), pp. 225–236. 8. Goldman R.P., 1993. Transsexualism, gender, and anxiety in traditional India. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 113(3), pp. 374–401. 9. Kapur R., 2009. Out of the colonial closet, but still thinking ‘inside the box’: regulating ‘perversion’ and the role of tolerance in de–radicalising the rights claims of sexual subalterns. NUJS Law Review, 2(3), pp. 381–396. 10. Kodiyath S.P., 2015. Deciphering the dichotomy: Supreme Court of India's contrasting jurisprudence on transgender rights and homosexuality. 11. Narrain A., 2004. The articulation of rights around sexuality and health: subaltern queer cultures in India in the era of Hindutva. Health and Human Rights, 7(2), pp. 142–164.